Just occasionally something quite innocuous happens that could be the moment an organisation or people arrive at a
tipping point. Just yesteray morning, on one of Methodism's more circumspect official blogs, the
Methodist Ecumenical News, a simple but significant and very welcome post appeared:
This is an appeal for information. There is a request from members of the Connexional Team for news of New Ecumenism, that is Methodist Churches working in partnership with new churches.
Examples of new churches might include be the Pioneer Networks, independent or house churches and of course Fresh Expressions. We would also be interested to hear of partnership working with churches not traditionally involved in ecumenical work, such as the black majority churches.
In the past I've expressed my concern that "ecumenicism" is too often about representatives of declining mainstream churches running around trying to find another corpse with which to share the coffin of history.
Three years ago there was a very sad article in the Methodist Recorder in which a former General Secretary made a
n appalling patronising call for Methodists to get to know Pentecostal churches. It wasn't because we may learn something from them about their expressions of faith. It was so that we could learn what Black majority churches were doing about "justice, non-discrimination and social cohesion". Contact would be on Methodist terms and to a Methodist agenda so that we could "learn" rather than share. We were not interested in white Pentecostals.
Over the years I've heard any number of jealous or dismissive comments about "car boot churches" and other dismissive comments from people surrounded by declining buildings and aging congregations. "Oh we Methodists have been so clever in not having anything to do with these new movements". And of course on the Methodist blogsphere there are no end of Methodist bloggers such as
connexions,
42, and the like who are always ready to have a pop at our younger "competitors". Just see how they cope with the idea that one expression of Christian worship may be speaking in tongues.
So with this very negative history and generally destructive background noise, it is encouraging to see that the connexional team are wanting examples of Methodist churches "working in partnership" with new churches suggesting a respect and equality.
It is also interesting to see how wide they are prepared to throw the net;
Pioneer networks, house churches (once denounced as cults on the front page of the Methodist Recorder), independent churches, and Black majority churches.
We have actually had some discussions at our church about establishing local ecumenical partnerships with new churches. These normally arise because the new churches (most of whom in theology are little different from Methodists) want to hire our premises. So far nothing has come of these suggestions but such an arrangement would seem perfectly natural.
But there is something that Methodism can offer other than premises: preacher training and the opportunity to test the call. We have had talks with an independent church along these lines. It is still early days and things have had to be put on hold whilst we sort out our building, but the idea is still there and very much alive.
So congratulations to the connexional team for having the maturity and courage to raise this issue and well done for working on the assumption of equality. British Methodism has a lot to give these new movements of the Spirit, we also have much to learn.