Friday, 19 November 2010

The last thing we need is another bank holiday

The biggest mistake in British history was to relinquish the position of Lord Protector in 1659. I personally don't have a problem with the present head of state. I've met her on three occasions and always have a polite though formal conversation.

American guests in particular are impressed by the photograph of our last meeting at Hereford Cathedral. But I think our next head of state should be elected.

Now one of her grandsons is to get married. Not a problem. I hope that the family can afford the wedding. I don't see why us taxpayers should fork out. They should do it discreetly at Windsor Castle one Saturday so we don't have to tie up the whole of Central London for a week.

The latest nonsense is the suggestion that there should be a public holiday for the day. The last time this happened was when the groom's father married. I was working for Walsall Council at the time, running the civic newspaper.

We had a newly elected Tory government that was absolutely hammering public services (there's nothing new under the sun). Walsall council was especially hit.

The Tory government - on a sort of bread and circuses basis - decided that the entire country should have the day off, a Bank Holiday. I rang the Downing Street press office and asked how much this would cost the country and whether the additional costs to the council would be met by central funding. I am still waiting for the call to be returned.

We are being told to cut public spending, to tighten our belts because we are all in it together blah blah and the government is now seriously considering the expense of a public holiday.

All businesses are obliged to pay employees on a bank holiday. It means our public services stop for the day but not the expense. People like me who sell our time by the day can't work and won't pay taxes. The months of April, may and June are especially problematic in this respect. The whole idea is just a massive extravagance.

If we've got money to spare let's protect services not waste it on another royal vanity project.

2 comments:

Ian G said...

They can't have it at Windsor Castle because the Chapel is not registered as a registry office. Prince Charles had this problem. If it was registered then anyopne could ask to be married there! Think of the security problems then.

Wherever they have a wedding there will be security issues. This is the Head of State's grandchild and second in line to the throne. The guest list cannot be limited to family and friends. There will be other Heads of State present. Some relatives are royal Heads of State elsewhere.

Cromwell's mistake was NOT becoming King. It was the way things were. He could have embedded his reforms without them being overturned by the Restoration of the Stuarts. Our society would have spiritually, morally and socially more advanced. The Industrial Revolution would have come into a more educated society and better able to cope.

Let's get rid of rich kings and have rich presidents instead. The Americans have to provide security for all their living former POTUSes as well as the current incumbent.

The system may not be perfect and could need some reform but the alternatives are no better and many are worse. Do you really want Tony Blair or David Cameron for President? Harriet Harman anyone...?

Fat Prophet said...

This post is a little bit Meldrewish (not sure if that's really a word but it works for me