There's been an interesting row brewing among Methodists in California which may one day soon have echoes here in the UK.
The Los Angeles Times reports:
In a bow to the growing diversity of America's religious landscape, the Claremont School of Theology, a Christian institution with long ties to the Methodist Church, will add clerical training for Muslims and Jews to its curriculum this fall, to become, in a sense, the first truly multi-faith American seminary.
The transition, which is being formally announced Wednesday, upends centuries of tradition in which seminaries have hewn not just to single faiths but often to single denominations within those faiths. Eventually, Claremont hopes to add clerical programs for Buddhists and Hindus.
Although there are other theological institutions that accept students of multiple faiths, or have partnerships with institutions of other religions, Claremont is believed to be the first accredited institution that will train students of multiple faiths for careers as clerics. The 275-student seminary offers master's and doctoral degrees.......
......But it is straining relations between the school and more conservative elements of the United Methodist Church, which this year was expected to provide about 8% of Claremont's $10-million budget. The church suspended its support for the school earlier this year pending an investigation.
Here in the Midlands we worship cheek by jowl with neighbours of other faiths. In our school system our children are encouraged to learn about all faiths, although Ofsted, the school standards watchdog, recently reported that they are failing when it came to teaching about Christianity.
In many of our institutions such as hospitals and prisons, chaplaincy services already have to provide for a wide span of religious belief. This means that Christian Ministers and Immans for example, share the same offices and line managers. They have to work together and respect one another's faith, even if they disagree with some of their colleagues most dearly held beliefs.
Ray Garston whose blog Pure Unbounded Love has been featured on the side bar of this blog for some time is working for the Queen's Foundation in Birmingham for Ecumenical Theological Education and the Methodist Church in Birmingham and the West Midlands UK as "Inter Faith Tutor and Enabler".
I must admit that I follow his blog but sometimes have a little difficulty completely understanding where he is coming from or even where he is going. Some of Ray's posts make my hair stand on end! But no one says that living in a multi-faith community is easy and there is much evidence from history that without a great deal of understanding on all sides disaster is often nearby. It will be interesting to see how Ray's work will be seen and understood in the fullness of time.
So in one sense the stance of the Claremont management makes sense: in an increasingly diverse America it makes sense for people of faith to work together. However I find it difficult to accept that this work should be funded by the Methodist people and have some sympathy for those that are asking a few difficult questions.
Respecting the faith of others does not mean that we simply say that the claims of other religious groups have the same validity in our eyes as the claims of Our Lord Jesus Christ.
Provided we accept that Jesus as the Son of God and Saviour of the world has a unique place in theology we have nothing to fear. Once we say or do anything to devalue this uniquieness - for example accept the Hindu line that Jesus is simply another "way" or the Muslem idea that he was another minor prophet - we surrender to a syncronism that will eventually lose the respect of those we wish to respect.
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
There is a world of difference between studying alongside each other and accepting all faiths as equal. Claremont are calling this program the "University Project", which fits perfectly: university is about sharing knowledge, not indoctrination (for want of a better word). When I read theology at university it was in a class of people of all beliefs and none - what a student believed was irrelevant to the matter of understanding the issues under study. It wasn't syncretism, by a long chalk.
I suspect the real driving force here is not a syncretistic agenda, but a financial one. The institution may be largely funded by Methodist people, but the real heart of their income will come from student fees. Embarking on this project widens the customer base, bringing in more fees - and incidentally happens to bring people of different faith communities into closer contact. They can agree to disagree, but at least they will have a better understanding of those with whom they disagree. Better that than ignorance and prejudice.
Thanks Tony. I take your point about the academic context of a theology degree. Those I know who study theology have told me of the wide spectrum of those studying alongside them.
Those of us without having undergone a formal full time theological course tend to see theology as training rather than education. Sometimes however I feel that a theological education puffs up rather broadens peoples perspective. We see this occasionally even in the minuscule Methodist blog sphere.
What you say about the fee income for the college is probably right. I personally don't see a problem with a Methodist enterprise trying to make an extra few quid. However I feel that this must not compromise the Methodist message and should be explicitly stated.
In my opinion, the "Millenials" that they are targeting to become students, aren't going to accept that their faith doesn't have equal status. These degrees are expensive, and Millenials reject the notion of inequality.
Of course the Faiths are equal, and because they aren't different. I'm not an intellectual, and I'm not even a Methodist, but I believe I understand this one, as they teach Islam, are they really going to teach the version of Islam were women are subjugated to Men?
Hardly, this version of Islam will be a sanitized one, as will this version of Judaism...and when they add them the Hindu and Buddhist, as well as Methodist, they all will, amazingly come to the exact same conclusions on progressive issues.
Am I wrong, how can I believe this...in fairness I don't know the people at Claremont, I'm speaking more about the feelings of Millenials, they fear no religion, no culture, no nationalism, because it all comes under the umbrella of their progressive understanding.
For those who don't know the latest HR-speak and the definition of a "millenial" I've found this link:
http://humanresources.about.com/od/glossarym/g/millenials.htm
Post a Comment