
Over the years I've always been a little wary of anything that seems to worship the creation rather than the Creator.
During the late 1980s and early 1990s I thoroughly investigated the so called "new age" movements and recognised how far their spirituality goes into a pre-Christian paganism. At one level it seems very harmless apart from taking the focus off the Great Transaction of the cross - but then so does fanatical support for Leyton Orient, a love of money or even Church politics.
This "new age" found political expression in the various "green" movements - not all of whom, incidentally, are necessarily on the political left. At that point no one - I mean this - no one, mentioned global warming. The focus seemed to be on preserving creation because creation should in itself be the centre of our life and worship.
But scratch a lot of "new age" paganism and a different picture can - not always - but can, emerge. I found in free and easy "new age" bookshops apparently respected publications that advocated child sacrifice. The more I learnt about Nazism, the more I saw that their ideology - the worship of Woden, the Sun God, and Thor - owed more to paganism than it ever did to Christianity.
Outcomes
So that is where I am coming from as I write this piece this morning. May I preface my remarks by making it clear that I am not suggesting that any regular readers or contributor to this blog would advocate child sacrifice or support Nazi paganism. What I am saying though, is that anything that smacks of worship of the creation rather than the Creator begins a spiritual process that can have some dangerous outcomes.
Earlier this week I dared to contradict David Gamble our newly inducted President of Methodist Conference for his suggestion that we should
"repent of the sins" that contribute to climate change. This posting was even taken up on
another Methodist blog that rarely links or accepts links from Methodist Preacher.
Both posts led to very lively discussions. What has surprised me is the absolutely certainty, verging on fanaticism, of some of the contributions. In other places, those of us who are mildly sceptical of what looks increasingly like hysteria, are called "climate change deniers", placing us in the same mad and bad category of those who deny the Holocaust! When the discussion gets to that level we need to take a deep breath and start counting to ten.
It now feels that nobody has any right to question the so called "scientific consensus". Anyone who does is clearly in the pay of the extreme right, the oil companies, international capitalism or whatever. But for the record, no one pays me.
Wisdom
I will give you an example of what this misleading propaganda can do. When I joined the European Parliament I believed the then current wisdom that every time I used a few pieces of paper I had somehow deprived the world of another tree in the Amazon. I was going to support massive recycling schemes in order to protect those trees. That was my contribution to bio-diversity and protecting the planet's supply of fresh air. We have had references to saving on paper on this blog in recent comments.
One day I had a visit from representatives of the various wood producers across Scandinavia. Their opening line was "why do you want to move jobs from rural Scandinavia to the urban heartlands of Europe?" That question came as a bit of a shock. I followed up their claim and found that Amazon rain forest wood is hardly used in the production of paper. Europe has sustainable forests that can supply as much paper as we need for as long as we need. Recycled paper creates work in urban areas paid for job losses in rural areas.
There are good reasons for not dumping paper into landfill, never mind "greenhouse gases". It also makes economic sense for a country such as Britain to recycle where it can in order to help our balance of payments. But don't let us accept the fantasy that by recycling paper we are saving endangered species in the rain forests.
Print
Methodist Church please read carefully: we can print all the hymn books and all the conference agendas we need and the impact on the world's non-renewable resources are negligible. When they cut down a tree in Scandinavia, providing much needed work of local people, within a few years the trees grow all over again and will do into the foreseeable future. Don't underestimate the Creator's creation. We are not "sinning" by using paper.
One contributor to my earlier thread assured us that climate change was a matter of great concern to the wider membership of the Methodist Church. I can only speak as one who preaches across one circuit. I don't find this concern. I know that people are desperately worried about the recession, there is a concern about immigration and asylum, there is a worry about the continuing war in Afghanistan.
Outside of the Church - please remember that I knock on doors for a political party and move assignments every few months - I don't find people concerned about climate change. What I do find is a growing groan about the issues of immigration and diversity. Not everyone shares the charitable view of us Methodists towards asylum seekers, many of whom we have welcomed into our churches and chapels.
Absolute
So I have a concern that we are becoming far less questioning and inquisitive about the "scientific consensus" of climate change than we are even of Scripture. Some of the absolute certainty that has been expressed on this blog and in other places makes me fear that concern about climate change will replace our priority to proclaim the Gospel. It borders dangerously on being a new religion, akin to a pagan "new age".
With a resurgent extreme right, a deep recession, growing numbers of problem gamblers, town centres inaccessible due to binge drinking, record levels of sexually transmitted diseases, growing exploitation of the most marginal parts of the labour force and much more, I feel the Methodist Church has enough on our plates without labeling people "sinners" for being skeptical about a fashionable hysteria and then devaluing the use of the word "repent".